Request For Comments – Computing Reference – eLook.org


Request For Comments



<standard> (RFC) One of a series, begun in 1969, of numbered Internet informational documents and standards widely followed by commercial software and freeware in the Internet and Unix communities.

Few RFCs are standards but all Internet standards are recorded in RFCs.

Perhaps the single most influential RFC has been RFC 822, the Internet electronic mail format standard.

The RFCs are unusual in that they are floated by technical experts acting on their own initiative and reviewed by the Internet at large, rather than formally promulgated through an institution such as ANSI.

For this reason, they remain known as RFCs even once adopted as standards.

The RFC tradition of pragmatic, experience-driven, after-the-fact standard writing done by individuals or small working groups has important advantages over the more formal, committee-driven process typical of ANSI or ISO.

Emblematic of some of these advantages is the existence of a flourishing tradition of “joke” RFCs; usually at least one a year is published, usually on April 1st.

Well-known joke RFCs have included 527 (“ARPAWOCKY”, R. Merryman, UCSD; 22 June 1973), 748 (“Telnet Randomly-Lose Option”, Mark R. Crispin; 1 April 1978), and 1149 (“A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers”, D. Waitzman, BBN STC; 1 April 1990).

The first was a Lewis Carroll pastiche; the second a parody of the TCP/IP documentation style, and the third a deadpan skewering of standards-document legalese, describing protocols for transmitting Internet data packets by carrier pigeon.

The RFCs are most remarkable for how well they work – they manage to have neither the ambiguities that are usually rife in informal specifications, nor the committee-perpetrated misfeatures that often haunt formal standards, and they define a network that has grown to truly worldwide proportions.

rfc.net (http://www.rfc.net/). W3 (http://www.w3.org/hypertext/DataSources/Archives/RFC_sites.html). JANET UK FTP (ftp://nic.ja.net/pub/newsfiles/JIPS/rfc). Imperial College, UK FTP (ftp://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/rfc/). Nexor UK (http://www.nexor.com/public/rfc/index/rfc.html). Ohio State U (http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/faq/usenet/top.html).

See also For Your Information, STD.

< Previous Terms Terms Containing Request For Comments Next Terms >
reply
Repondez s’il vous plait
Report Program Generator
repository
Representation Language Language
Internet-Draft
Internet Experiment Note
RFC
STD
request for proposal
Request For Technology
Required-COBOL
requirements
Requirements Acquisition and Controlled Evolution

Best casinos
Glory Casino is one of Bangladesh's most prominent and generous online casinos, with 3,000+ slots and live games from top providers. Beginner-friendly and mobile-ready, it offers big welcome bonuses, fast payouts, and fair winning odds.
Wintomic Casino offers a calm, well-structured gaming experience with a wide range of quality slots and live games from trusted providers. With secure SSL encryption, fair RNG play, and clear bonus terms, it's built for smooth, reliable fun.
Play the best casino games on Banger Casino across mobile and desktop and win real money! Enjoy a massive slots library, live dealers, and table games, plus a 125% welcome bonus up to €250 under a valid Curaçao license. Sign up today.
Divine Casino delivers a secure, stylish gaming experience with thousands of slots, live dealers, crash games, and sports betting. Claim a generous welcome bonus with free spins, enjoy fast withdrawals, and play with 24/7 support.

© Copyright 2026 Elook.org
Powered by WordPress | Mercury Theme