RFC 1499 (rfc1499) - Page 2 of 21

Summary of 1400-1499

RFC 1499                  Summary of 1400-1499              January 1997


1497    Reynolds     Aug 93   BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions

This RFC is a slight revision and extension of RFC-1048 by Philip
Prindeville, who should be credited with the original work in this memo.
This memo is a status report on the vendor information extensions used
in the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP).


1496    Alverstrand  Aug 93   Rules for Downgrading Messages from
                              X.400/88 to X.400/84 When MIME
                              Content-Types are Present in the
                              Messages

This document describes how RFC-1328 must be modified in order to
provide adequate support for the scenarios:

                    SMTP(MIME) -> X.400(84)
                    X.400(84) -> SMTP(MIME)

It replaces chapter 6 of RFC-1328. The rest of RFC-1328 is NOT
obsoleted.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]


1495    Alverstrand  Aug 93   Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822
                              Message Bodies

Since the introduction of X.400(84), there has been work ongoing for
defining mappings between MHS and RFC-822.  The most recent work in this
area is RFC-1327 [3], which focuses primarily on translation of envelope
and headers.  This document is complimentary to RFC-1327 as it focuses
on translation of the message body.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]


1494    Alverstrand  Aug 93   Equivalences between 1988 X.400 and
                              RFC-822 Message Bodies

This document describes the content of the "IANA MHS/MIME Equivalence
table", and defines the initial configuration of this table.  Mappings
for new MIME content-types and/or X.400 body part types should be
registered with the IANA to minimize redundancy and promote
interoperability. [STANDARDS-TRACK]










Elliott                      Informational