RFC 264 (rfc264) - Page 1 of 9
The Data Transfer Protocol
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
Network Working Group A. Bhushan
Request for Comments: 264 MIT
NIC: 7812 B. Braden
UCLA
W. Crowther
BBN
E. Harslem
J. Heafner
Rand
A. McKenzie
BBN
J. Melvin
SRI
B. Sundberg
Harvard
D. Watson
SRI
J. White
UCSB
15 November 1971
THE DATA TRANSFER PROTOCOL
This paper is a revision of RFC 171, NIC 6793. The changes to RFC
171 are given below. The protocol is then restated for your
convenience.
CHANGES TO RFC 171
1) The sequence number field is changed to 16 bits in the error (Type
B5) transactions, thus resolving the ambiguity in the previous
specification. In addition, the information separators (Type B4)
transactions shall also contain a 16-bit sequence number field.
2) The modes available (Type B3) transactions shall define only the
modes available for receive, instead of both receive and send. In
simplex connections modes available transactions should not be
sent as they are meaningless. In full-duplex connections, the
modes available transactions are still required.
3) The code assignments for "End Code" in information separators and
for "function" in abort transactions have been changed to reflect
a numerical order rather than "bit-coding".
4) Minor editorial changes.
Bhushan, et. al.