RFC 894 (rfc894) - Page 1 of 3
Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernet networks
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
Network Working Group Charles Hornig Request for Comments: 894 Symbolics Cambridge Research Center April 1984 A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks Status of this Memo This RFC specifies a standard method of encapsulating Internet Protocol (IP) [1] datagrams on an Ethernet [2]. This RFC specifies a standard protocol for the ARPA-Internet community. Introduction This memo applies to the Ethernet (10-megabit/second, 48-bit addresses). The procedure for transmission of IP datagrams on the Experimental Ethernet (3-megabit/second, 8-bit addresses) is described in [3]. Frame Format IP datagrams are transmitted in standard Ethernet frames. The type field of the Ethernet frame must contain the value hexadecimal 0800. The data field contains the IP header followed immediately by the IP data. The minimum length of the data field of a packet sent over an Ethernet is 46 octets. If necessary, the data field should be padded (with octets of zero) to meet the Ethernet minimum frame size. This padding is not part of the IP packet and is not included in the total length field of the IP header. The minimum length of the data field of a packet sent over an Ethernet is 1500 octets, thus the maximum length of an IP datagram sent over an Ethernet is 1500 octets. Implementations are encouraged to support full-length packets. Gateway implementations MUST be prepared to accept full-length packets and fragment them if necessary. If a system cannot receive full-length packets, it should take steps to discourage others from sending them, such as using the TCP Maximum Segment Size option [4]. Note: Datagrams on the Ethernet may be longer than the general Internet default maximum packet size of 576 octets. Hosts connected to an Ethernet should keep this in mind when sending datagrams to hosts not on the same Ethernet. It may be appropriate to send smaller datagrams to avoid unnecessary fragmentation at intermediate gateways. Please see [4] for further information on this point. Hornig