RFC 2051 (rfc2051) - Page 2 of 124


Definitions of Managed Objects for APPC using SMIv2



Alternative Format: Original Text Document



RFC 2051              SNANAU APPC MIB using SMIv2           October 1996


   purpose of management.

   The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
   experimentation and evaluation.

3.  Overview

   This document identifies the proposed set of objects for managing the
   configuration, monitoring and controlling devices with APPC
   capabilities.  APPC is the aspect of SNA which supports peer-to-peer
   communication, and provides the interface for applications to
   communicate.  In this document, we will describe LU6.2 protocol-
   specific managed objects.

   This document describes both dependent and independent LU 6.2
   protocols.

   A dependent LU requires assistance from an SSCP in order to activate
   an LU 6.2 session.  An independent LU is able to activate an LU 6.2
   session without assistance from the SSCP.  If the agent supports
   dependent LU 6.2 only, the SNA NAU MIB, RFC 1666 [7] is used instead
   to represent those objects.

   Local LUs and partner LUs connect with each other using sessions.
   Multiple different sessions can be established between LUs with
   characteristics defined by Modes.  Session limits within a defined
   Mode are negotiated between the local and partner LUs using a
   protocol called CNOS (Change Number of Sessions).

   Transaction Programs (TPs) are applications that use sessions to
   communicate with each other.  Multiple TPs can use the same session,
   but not at the same time. A single usage of a session is called a
   conversation. While a session can stay active for a long time, a
   conversation can come up and down based on usage by the TPs.

   Common Programming Interface - Communications (CPI-C) is a standard
   API (Application Programming Interface) for APPC and OSI TP that is
   used by TPs for accessing conversations. Although, many of the CPI-C
   objects in this MIB are relevant to both APPC and OSI TP, the
   intention is for managing APPC products only.

   SNA names such as LU names, CP names, mode names, and COS names can
   be padded with space characters in SNA formats.  These space
   characters are insignificant.  For example, in a BIND RU a mode name
   of "#INTER" with a length of 6 is identical to a mode name of "#INTER
   " with a length of 8.  However, in this MIB, insignificant space
   characters are not included by the agent. Using the mode name from
   the previous example, an agent would return a length of 6 and the



Allen, et. al.              Standards Track