RFC 2832 (rfc2832) - Page 1 of 39

NSI Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1

Alternative Format: Original Text Document
Next >
Network Working Group                                      S. Hollenbeck
Request for Comments: 2832                                 M. Srivastava
Category: Informational                 Network Solutions, Inc. Registry
                                                                May 2000


          NSI Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0

Status of this Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This document describes a protocol for the registration and
   management of second level domain names and associated name servers
   in both generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) and country code Top Level
   Domains (ccTLDs). This protocol was developed by the Network
   Solutions Registry for use within the Shared Registration System and
   is being published "as-is" to document the protocol implementation
   developed by the Network Solutions, Inc. Registry.

   Internet domain name registration typically involves three entities:
   a registrant who wishes to register a domain name, a registrar who
   provides services to the registrant, and a registry that provides
   services to the registrar while serving as the authoritative
   repository of all functional information required to resolve names
   registered in the registry's TLDs.  This document describes a
   protocol for registry-registrar communication only.  The protocol
   does not provide any registrant services.

   This document is being discussed on the "rrp" mailing list.  To join
   the list, send a message to [email protected]> with the
   words "subscribe rrp" in the body of the message. There is also a web
   site for the mailing list archives at
   .

Conventions Used In This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [MUSTSHOULD]. Further,



Hollenbeck & Srivastava      Informational
Next >