RFC 1749 (rfc1749) - Page 1 of 10
IEEE 802
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
Network Working Group K. McCloghrie
Request for Comments: 1749 F. Baker
Updates: 1748 E. Decker
Category: Standards Track cisco Systems, Inc.
December 1994
IEEE 802.5 Station Source Routing MIB using SMIv2
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................. 1
2. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework .................. 2
2.1 Object Definitions ...................................... 2
3. Overview ................................................. 2
3.1 Source Routing .......................................... 2
3.2 Relationship to RFC 1748 ................................ 3
3.3 Relationship to RFC 1525 ................................ 3
3.4 Static Source Routes .................................... 4
3.5 Destinations on the Local Ring .......................... 4
4. Definitions .............................................. 4
5. Acknowledgements ......................................... 8
6. References ............................................... 8
7. Security Considerations .................................. 9
8. Authors' Addresses ....................................... 10
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes managed objects used by IEEE 802.5 end-
stations for managing source routes on a Token Ring network where
IEEE source-routing is in use. IEEE source-routing is described in
802.5 Token Ring Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications [8]
and related ISO publications [9, 10, 11].
This memo is an incremental update to RFC 1748 [6]. It is documented
separately from the RFC 1748 solely due to the latter's maturity
within the Internet standardization process.
McCloghrie, Baker & Decker