RFC 312 (rfc312) - Page 1 of 2
Proposed Change in IMP-to-Host Protocol
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
Network Working Group A. McKenzie
RFC #312 BBN
NIC 9342 22 March 1972
Categories: B.1
Proposed Change in IMP-to-Host Protocol
We are currently considering a redefinition of the IMP-to-Host
error message types (type 1 and type 8) and the creation of addi-
tional IMP-to-Host error message types. We believe that these
changes will assist the Hosts in determining appropriate recovery
action, without causing any serious reprogramming problems. Our
current plans are to install these changes within a few months;
therefore we should be informed of any strong negative reactions
relatively quickly.
The proposed changes fall into two general classes as de-
scribed below:
A) General Error Message
---------------------
Under certain circumstances, particularly when the Host
has been unresponsive to queued input for a "long time"
the IMP drops its ready line for a short period, causing
the "error flip-flops" to be set (see RFC #270, NIC 7818).
Under these conditions the IMP sends a few NOP's to the
Host and then resumes normal operation. We propose to
send the Host a new message (message type 13) in addition
to the NOPs; this message will tell the Host that the
IMP's Ready Line was dropped, that the IMP's error flop
was set, and that the IMP will respond to the next com-
pletion of a Host-to-IMP message with a type 1 or type 8
message (because of the setting of the IMP's error flop.
B) Error Messages which are Responses to Specific
----------------------------------------------
Host-to-IMP Transmissions:
--------------------------
1) IMP-to-Host message type 1 will be redefined to mean:
"IMP's Error flip-flop was set on a message which
the IMP cannot identify."
2) IMP-to-Host message type 8 will be redefined to mean:
"IMP's Error flip-flop was set during receipt of the
message identified by the 'source' and 'link number'
bits of this error message."