RFC 2114 (rfc2114) - Page 2 of 22
Data Link Switching Client Access Protocol
Alternative Format: Original Text Document
RFC 2114 DCAP February 1997
1. Introduction
Since the Data Link Switching Protocol, RFC 1795, was published, some
software vendors have begun implementing DLSw on workstations. The
implementation of DLSw on a large number of workstations raises
several important issues that must be addressed. Scalability is the
major concern. For example, the number of TCP sessions to the DLSw
router increases in direct proportion to the number of workstations
added. Another concern is efficiency. Since DLSw is a switch-to-
switch protocol, it is not efficient when implemented on
workstations.
DCAP addresses the above issues. It introduces a hierarchical
structure to resolve the scalability problems. All workstations are
clients to the router (server) rather than peers to the router. This
creates a client/server model. It also provides a more efficient
protocol between the workstation (client) and the router (server).
2. Overview
2.1. DCAP Client/Server Model
+-----------+ +-----------+ +---------+
| Mainframe | | IP Router +- ppp -+ DLSw |
+--+--------+ +-----+-----+ | Work |
| | | Station |
| | +---------+
+--+--+ +-------------+ |
| FEP +- TR -+ DLSw Router +-- IP Backbone
+-----+ +-------------+ |
|
|
+-----------+ +---------+
| IP Router +- ppp -+ DLSw |
+-----+-----+ | Work |
| Station |
+---------+
| DLSw Session |
+-------------------------------+
Figure 2-1. Running DLSw on a large number of workstations creates a
scalability problem.
Figure 2-1 shows a typical DLSw implementation on a workstation. The
workstations are connected to the central site DLSw router over the
IP network. As the network grows, scalability will become an issue
as the number of TCP sessions increases due to the growing number of
workstations.
Chiang, et. al. Informational